Posted February 28, 2006
A unique way of dealing with the priest shortage other than importing
priests
Recommended by Rev. Virgilio Elizondo in
International Priests in America
[Study already cited on our website]
One thing that has become very clear over the years is that simply because a
priest is from Spain or Latin America does not prepare him to work with the
Spanish-speaking of the United States. In many cases, simply bringing in a
Spanish-speaking priest disrupts a very active and dynamic lay apostolate.
When people move to the United States, they begin to acculturate in many
ways and are no longer the same as they were in Latin America. In many ways
they remain very Latino/a, yet in many other ways they become very
acculturated to the United States. For better or worse, they become
something new, something different. Simply because a priest speaks Spanish
does not prepare him to work well with Spanish-speaking Americans. More is
needed.
What I think we need, something that I have been advocating for many years,
is the formation of a “St. James Missionary Society” in reverse! Priests
could join the society for a certain number of years, have a sufficient
period of cultural, linguistic, and spiritual preparation, and then, in
cooperation with the inviting diocese, determine the place and nature of
their work. These priests could be visited regularly by the coordinator of
the society, have regular regional meetings, and put on an annual
retreat-meeting, where they could enjoy fellowship, pray together, discuss
their work, and celebrate the Eucharist together. This would be the place
where success stories could be shared, and difficulties and problems could
be discussed openly. If need be, the superior of the society could then
discuss the problem areas with the bishop of the diocese concerned.
I do not believe that the present way of doing things will work, that is,
bishops recruiting directly from Columbia, Mexico, or other countries. It
would be far better to have a well-planned program that could keep improving
through the successes and failures of the participants.
|